I am running two servers with Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012 (core) and using Hyper-V Replica between the two servers. Both ends have 30/5 Mbps connections (down/up).
There is only one VM on each server that is being replicated. Most of the changes/data is accumulated on ServerA.
I initially setup ServerA and ServerB side by side for their first replication and then moved ServerB to the remote location.
Recently there was a lot of data added to ServerA (around 300-400 GB). Over the past several weeks more data has been added. In checking the Replica stats it showed a peak of around 980 GB.
Around September 9th the replication stopped while ServerB showed the VM was "Modifying Resource." This continued for several hours.
Afterwards the replication resumed. (I don't recall if I had to manually restart the replication or if it resumed on its own.) But I still had several hundred GB to replicate.
Last night the replication was around 95%. A few hours later I assume it must have hit 100% as when I checked I found the replication had stopped and ServerB was again showing the ServerA VM as "Modifying Resource."
I thought this should have meant the full 980 GB of data had finally been replicated. When the replication resumed it was as if a "snapshot" had completed. But in checking the stats I still saw the following.
Size of data yet to be replicated:616.64 GB
Last synchronized at:09/09/2013 10:22:01 PM
So after running constantly since at least September 8th the amount of replication completed was only about 1/3 of the amount of data. And the date only moved up by 6 days.
I haven't added any data to ServerA recently, but anticipate in the next week or two I will. At this rate I'm wondering if ServerB will ever catch up and the ServerA VM be fully replicated?
When the replication resumed last night it showed 2% completed. After running overnight (about 6 hours) it only shows 4% completed.
When making some estimates about performance I thought 5 Mbps upload speed should work for the relatively small amount of data I need to replicate. But now I'm not sure it is going to be adequate to keep up?
Especially after seeing that once the replication reaches 100% that doesn't seem to mean that all the pending data I see is going to have been sent. Only a "snapshot" is likely to have completed?
Has anyone else done similar testing and have you got any insight you can share about these topics?
Theokrat