Quantcast
Channel: Hyper-V forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 19461

With local storage, should DFS-R be on Parent or VM?

$
0
0

I recently went down the road of trying to make local RAID storage HA. I’m currently trying products such as Starwind and Open-E.  However, I’m now considering just going back to DFS-R.

Setup:

Two nodes at two locations for a total of four nodes.  All running Windows 2012 Server with local storage.

Goal:

24/7 access to updated data at either location.

Thoughts:

  • I know DFS-R will work as I’ve used it many times before, but never in close relation to Hyper-V. My storage is local, so I’m thinking that the DFS-R should sit directly on each Parent partition. Any arguments to the contrary?
  • Is it worth looking into BranchCache too, or will that cause headaches when used with DFS-R?
  • As for the VM’s, I’m pretty sure I can still make them HA using SMB 3.0, but I know Hyper-V Replica will go a long way if not. Thoughts?
  • With regards to DFS-R, is Peerlock still the go to solution for making sure files are locked across the WAN?

Feel free to mention anything that I’m not smart enough to think of, thanks.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 19461

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>