I was really exited when i first started ready about all the new features that Microsoft promised in Hyper-V 2012.
But after I experimented with it, I'm rather disappointed at the gap between the marketing hype and the actual capabilities.
So I can now Build a "Cluster in a box".
But in order to move beyond this, there are 2 problems which I can not find an obvious/cost effective solution to:
- How to make the storage resilient
- How to scale this beyond 2 hosts.
For Question 1 the only answers I know of is:
- Buy an expensive SAN
- Buy starwind's iSCSI SAN software
After reading over and over again that 2012 removes the need for a SAN, this is very disappointing.
Please share if there are other solutions out there I am not aware of.
For Question 2:
For what I have read I could use one of the following to get more than 2 hosts into my Cluster.
- Use a SAS switch (few grand)
- Use a SAS expander such as this one: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/servers/raid/raid-expander-res2cv.html (few hundred)
With either solution I start to to wonder about I/O limitations.
When I use a non-expander backplane, I get 1 SFF cable per 4 discs, so I'd need pretty amazing discs to max out the interface
But when I use SAS-expanders, I get 1 SFF cable for all my discs; Now I can get into situations where the discs have greater I/O than the interface.
Please let me know if there are other solutions out there I am currently not aware of.